There is great excitement in the blogosphere at the moment, as the Sydney Writers Centre have just announced that their competition seeking to find the “Best Australian Blogs” are now open again.
I’ve had a look over things and I’ve got a few criticisms about these awards. No, I’m not criticising anyone for linkbait again (although I could), this time, my complaints are of a more personal nature.
Firstly, I love the idea of having “Special Awards” for blogs. I love to see a good blog post highlighted as much as the next person and I am eagerly awaiting the finalists, in the hope that I can find some new bloggers to add to my reader.
My complaints lie with this part of the competition details however:
Special awards are competition-wide accolades designed to recognise outstanding posts and blogging potential. These are the perfect opportunity for smaller blogs to get noticed and celebrated. There are two types of special awards – two for younger blogs and two for outstanding posts.
You must enter the relevant URL or dates requested for each round you want to enter.
The special awards for 2012 are:
- Outstanding funny blog post
The most hilarious post entered.- Outstanding advocacy blog post
The best blog posts advocating or fundraising for an issue.- Best new blog
The best blog under 6 months old.- Best young blogger
The best blog written by a writer under 26.[highlighting mine]
Hormone induced grumpiness on my part? Very likely – but I don’t like that people assume that because a blogger is younger than 26, their blog is automatically “smaller” and “younger”. Is this just a terminology complaint? I don’t think so.
I have a personal interest here, because I am 23 – and yet my blog is coming up to five years old. Older than a good deal of blogs in the Australian Blogosphere. And – if I do say so myself, it’s a relatively successful platform for me and I’m rather proud of its popularity.
Does the Sydney Writers Centre assume that popularity only comes with a side of wrinkles? It feels rather ageist, if anything.
My other complaint is that because I write about parenting here, I can only have my blog nominated in the Parenting category.
I nearly choked laughing at the possibility of me having any chance at the parenting category – have you seen who the judge is? The entire Internet by this stage knows that Brenda rather dislikes me and my opinions, and therefore, I can’t see me having a snowflakes chance.
Maybe that would be the case anyway – maybe Sleepless Nights is not good enough to ever win awards. But I would like the right to start from the same starting point as everyone else in the race.
We won’t even discuss the ethics of having someone who is part of the parenting community themselves, judging this category – but I will ask, is it fair to ask someone to judge their friends and peers, and decide who is best, while expecting them to remain completely impartial?
All of this might sound like sour grapes, but, is it sour grapes to voice the legitimate concerns I have? And ought I be penalised for asking these questions?
It remains to be seen whether my concerns will be taken seriously, or taken personally.
And yes, I’d love to be nominated still and I would love to win.
But will I be holding my breath? No, I will not.
{ Comments on this entry are closed }











