Soapbox

I know, I know. I shouldn’t read Mamamia. I’m pretty sure it is the online equivalent to Today Tonight and A Current Affair, both of which will make your brain cells commit seppaku in protest. But of course, Mamamia is the best troll* website of the lot of them, and I’ve been sucked in like everyone else.

[*Proper definition of a Troll: Someone online who seeks to incite argument, to shock, to cause uproar. See here.]

The debate this week is all about Birthzillas. You know, those crunchy hippy women who bury their placenta under a tree and care about birthing without drugs. Those women that Mia labels “smug and superior”, forgetting that in the same article she was acting just as smug and holier than thou for wanting a legion of doctors at her command.

And here’s where I clarify that I am not judging anyone’s birth choices. I would love all women to have the birth that feels best for them, with the outcome being a happy one. C-section, epidural, home birth, water birth, midwives – I don’t CARE how you birth.

I do however, reserve the right to care about how I birth.

When my first child was born, I went into that delivery suite with no expectations. In fact, that was my entire birth plan. I hadn’t prepared myself for anything, because anything could happen. Surely that’s a good thing right? An open mind about the whole process?

Unfortunately, I was 17 and despite having a loving and supportive partner by my side the whole time, the midwife and doctor who helped me birth seemed bent on making it a “lesson” on why teenagers should not get pregnant. There was no calming influence, no discussion and when it came to getting my daughter out, I was given an episiotomy and a ventouse extraction, while the doctor screamed at me and the the midwife tut-tutted. My entire labour was a bit over 7 hours long and full of more trauma that I ever thought possible.

They left the student OB-GYN to stitch me up afterwards, while I lay in the delivery bed, legs in stirrups, listening to her curse as she re-did my stitches three times. It was her first perineal repair.

It took me twelve months to heal from the episiotomy. That’s twelve months to heal enough to have intercourse without pain, or to urinate without discomfort.

When I fell pregnant with my second child, I was determined to have a better birth. Still scarred from my first experience, I set out to educate myself as much as possible about everything that could go wrong, so that in my own mind, I was more prepared than the first time. I read midwifery blogs, L&D nurse blogs and as much about the natural processes of birth as possible.

I decided I didn’t want to birth with drugs if I could help it and that my birth needed to be as low intervention as possible, not just for my and the baby’s health, but for my own sanity. I saw a supportive midwifery team and despite a pregnancy that seemed likely to have a poor outcome, I birthed my son in hospital, in a calm environment, with two midwives attending and Nathan holding my hands.

No stitches, no stirrups, no screaming, no loss of control and bodily autonomy. The midwife told me afterwards that she was honoured to have witnessed my birth and help deliver my son.

Now I’m pregnant with our third child and determined to have the birth I want again. It may not go to plan – I have fast labours and we have a backup plan if I physically cannot make it to the hospital. This time however, I have a medical reason for needing a low intervention birth.

Turns out I have a rare connective tissue disorder, that affects my collagen. Among other things, I don’t heal easily or well, my joints dislocate and my blood pressure has an alarming habit of dropping dramatically, making me dizzy enough to vomit and pass out.

These things are not conducive to high-intervention births. If, for instance, I was to have a caesarean, it’s likely I would end up in a wheelchair for a good while after birth. An epidural would have the potential to drop my blood pressure low enough to cause serious damage and an episiotomy, as I’ve already discovered, takes a long long time to heal.

As I creep closer to the point where I will birth this third child of mine, I am well aware of my condition and how it will affect my birth. My midwives and doctors have also been appraised of this – but it’s not their job to manage my Ehlers Danlos. Their job is helping me deliver a healthy baby, while not landing me in a wheelchair. My job is to provide them with the information for them to be able to do this, while keeping the baby and I safe.

This is why I have a birth plan and a more-than-passing need for a natural birth. Not because I am a birthzilla, but because I am educated about my choices and the consequences of them.

So before Mia makes a sweeping judgement about all women who want to give birth naturally, based on a trite dinner party anecdote, maybe she ought to educate herself about WHY women make the decisions they do.

It’s not all black and white Mia.

 

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

There is great excitement in the blogosphere at the moment, as the Sydney Writers Centre have just announced that their competition seeking to find the “Best Australian Blogs” are now open again.

I’ve had a look over things and I’ve got a few criticisms about these awards. No, I’m not criticising anyone for linkbait again (although I could), this time, my complaints are of a more personal nature.

Firstly, I love the idea of having “Special Awards” for blogs. I love to see a good blog post highlighted as much as the next person and I am eagerly awaiting the finalists, in the hope that I can find some new bloggers to add to my reader.

My complaints lie with this part of the competition details however:

Special awards are competition-wide accolades designed to recognise outstanding posts and blogging potential. These are the perfect opportunity for smaller blogs to get noticed and celebrated. There are two types of special awards – two for younger blogs and two for outstanding posts.

You must enter the relevant URL or dates requested for each round you want to enter.

The special awards for 2012 are:

  • Outstanding funny blog post
    The most hilarious post entered.
  • Outstanding advocacy blog post
    The best blog posts advocating or fundraising for an issue.
  • Best new blog
    The best blog under 6 months old.
  • Best young blogger
    The best blog written by a writer under 26.

[highlighting mine]

Hormone induced grumpiness on my part? Very likely – but I don’t like that people assume that because a blogger is younger than 26, their blog is automatically “smaller” and “younger”. Is this just a terminology complaint? I don’t think so.

I have a personal interest here, because I am 23 – and yet my blog is coming up to five years old. Older than a good deal of blogs in the Australian Blogosphere. And – if I do say so myself, it’s a relatively successful platform for me and I’m rather proud of its popularity.

Does the Sydney Writers Centre assume that popularity only comes with a side of wrinkles? It feels rather ageist, if anything.

My other complaint is that because I write about parenting here, I can only have my blog nominated in the Parenting category.

I nearly choked laughing at the possibility of me having any chance at the parenting category  – have you seen who the judge is? The entire Internet by this stage knows that Brenda rather dislikes me and my opinions, and therefore, I can’t see me having a snowflakes chance.

Maybe that would be the case anyway – maybe Sleepless Nights is not good enough to ever win awards. But I would like the right to start from the same starting point as everyone else in the race.

We won’t even discuss the ethics of having someone who is part of the parenting community themselves, judging this category – but I will ask, is it fair to ask someone to judge their friends and peers, and decide who is best, while expecting them to remain completely impartial?

All of this might sound like sour grapes, but, is it sour grapes to voice the legitimate concerns I have? And ought I be penalised for asking these questions?

It remains to be seen whether my concerns will be taken seriously, or taken personally.

And yes, I’d love to be nominated still and I would love to win.

But will I be holding my breath? No, I will not.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Otherwise entitled, “Why so judgey, Internet?”

Yesterday, 93.6 Hobart asked on their facebook page, what we as parents do to combat feelings of isolation or guilt. There were some great answers and the lovely Sallyanne and I agreed that online communities are an excellent way to keep in touch with friends and family when real life doesn’t enable you to do that.

My stock standard answer, whenever anyone asks me what I do to keep myself sane is “I blog.”

And it’s true. This little community here has saved my sanity on more than one occasion.

Sure, I do other things to make myself happy – I take time out to read books, I daydream, I buy delicious loose leaf tea and refuse to talk to anyone while I drink it. I take the smallest things and savour them and I laugh, a lot.

Mostly though, my sanity saver is blogging.

However, social media is a very new thing and it wasn’t available to a lot of parents. Something that people are all too willing to remind us.

And really, flippant comments like “We had no time for sipping lattes and babycinos in trendy cafes” are not adding anything to the conversation, except a bucketload of guilt that apparently, mothers nowadays are doing it wrong.

I could rant and rave about judging people (how do you know that mother in a trendy cafe with her baby isn’t taking her first time out in 6 months? how do you know it isn’t her one outing this month? HOW DO YOU KNOW?) but it wouldn’t do any good – people would still be judging and mothers would still be getting landed with a large guilt trip over “not doing it tough enough”.

Guilt is a useless emotion. It doesn’t do anything except make me doubt myself and when Amy was a baby (screaming, screaming all the time) I promised that I would not guilt trip myself. I would refuse to feel bad for sneaking a coffee at a cafe with my mothers group and I would refuse to feel bad for things I could not control.

Nowadays, I don’t “do” guilt. But it doesn’t stop me wanting to explain myself and my unique set of circumstances to every single judgey person out there. Should I explain about autism? About Ehlers Danlos? About how the Internet has very truly saved my sanity?

Sure. I could.

But I’m also pretty sure that it wouldn’t make a difference to people who want to play pain olympics and talk about who has it tougher, or who is the most selfless mother, putting themselves last always.

Here’s the thing:

I take good care of my sanity, because for a while there, I consistently put myself last and not only did I nearly have a mental breakdown, I nearly had a physical one.

It took me a long time to recover and I am reluctant to ever let things get to that point again.

Things are better now. I take time out to look after myself.

And sure, some days that time out is merely sitting in my bedroom alone for 10 minutes while I drink a cup of tea.

Other days, it’s taking the time to feel the sun on my face while I remember to breathe. Or turning the music up really loud and not caring what anyone else thinks of my musical tastes. Or leaving the children with their Daddy, while I attend events in the city.

I’m not a martyr and I refuse to be one.

Life is hard enough without carrying around a backpack full of guilt.

I would love to know, what do you do to preserve your sanity? Any tips for parents (especially new parents) who might be struggling?

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

We’ve all heard about the dangers of Listeria, supposedly lurking in every single piece of cold food that you didn’t prepare by hand, yourself. No soft cheeses, no restaurant salads, no uncooked egg based sauces, no ham, salami or other deli meats and certainly certainly no sushi.

Today I made sushi using smoked salmon and I enjoyed every single mouthful of it. The benefit to eating something that I felt like eating, for me, far outweighed the minuscule risks associated with eating a cold prepared food.

Listeria is a food poisoning. It isn’t a bacteria that is present in all cold food – no, it’s food poisoning that can potentially grow in cold prepared food and is killed by heating. You’ve probably got more chance of contracting salmonella than contracting listeria on any given day.

And yet, I find that as soon as I’m pregnant, there is this Listeria Hysteria that surrounds every mouthful of food I eat. Does that contain ham? Has that lettuce been washed and stored properly? Is that egg cooked through entirely?

I’m just a little bit sick of it. Especially considering if you’re hospitalised during your pregnancy, the hospital sends you up commercially prepared ham salad sandwiches for lunch anyway and the midwives don’t bat an eyelid.

Pregnant women seem to become public property. Everyone suddenly has a say in what we’re putting into our bodies and it’s getting a bit ridiculous. I’ve already given up a lot of things in order for this pregnancy to progress safely, I don’t particularly feel like giving up all cold foods too.

My baby might die from listeria – but also, I might get hit by a car tomorrow. Or a truck might crash into my bedroom. Or I might fall down a flight of stairs.

I don’t think it’s about being frightened, so much as it’s about being risk aware. If I prepare sushi at home, using ingredients I trust, in a clean environment, then my chances of listeria are probably smaller than my chances of contracting salmonella, or breaking my nose walking into a wall (very real possibility).

This is my fourth pregnancy and hopefully our third baby. Any number of things could go wrong yet. My chances of pre-term labour are higher than normal, my pelvis might fall apart, I might dislocate a hip and end up hospitalised. I might get an infection (again) and land in hospital for a week (again).

Anything could happen, but provided I am careful, I am doubtful that it is going to contain listeria.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

I’ve been resisting writing this post for a long time, but here it is.

I was a teen mother and pregnant as a teenager twice. Amy was born when I was 17 and Isaac was conceived when I was 19, and born two months after I turned 20.

There is my bias, disclosed.

When you are pregnant as a teenager, you are subjected to a certain amount of harsh treatment. This is deemed acceptable by society, apparently, because no one disagreed with family acquaintances calling me a slut and no one thought anything of the midwives at the hospital treating me badly. Nor did anyone listen to my complaints about the doctor who attended Amy’s delivery shouting at me, or the brusque treatment of the midwife in attendance, who provided no support, merely barking orders at me.

That kind of treatment is to be expected when you’re 17 and obviously too stupid to keep your legs closed.

The treatment from medical staff didn’t change once my daughter was delivered and I was chastised for feeding her too much, for attempting to breastfeed too often, for undressing her, and for co-sleeping and for not agreeing to midwife home visits for the first 6 weeks post-partum.

When Amy went on to scream and refuse to sleep for her first months, it was apparently because I was a teenager mother (or maybe because my milk wasn’t good enough – depending on who was asked), rather than certain ASD qualities and a preference for being awake.

I was made to feel stupid and lesser, by all but one professional I came into contact with. The exception being an older clinic nurse who had seen it all and seemed merely impressed that I had a supportive partner and breasts that lactated magnificently. A far cry from the later clinic nurse who we stopped seeing.

If you’re a teenager walking with your newborn baby through a supermarket, shopping isn’t all about the strangers cooing over your gorgeous baby. No, it’s about the sideways looks, the slight sneer and the almost palpable relief that people exhibited when they saw that I was with a partner.

My second pregnancy was fraught with similar issues. The only thing worse than being a teen mother, apparently, is being 19 and pregnant with your second baby.

No one cares about your backstory, or what you’re doing with your life, or your plans and goals – no, as a young woman, your entire worth is tied up in your reproductive system and what you’ve done with it.

And lest you think that I am alone in these observations, a quick conversation on Facebook showed that if anything, I was treated quite well, in the scheme of things.

Think about that for a minute.

People were telling me that midwives would refuse pain relief to teenage mothers, in order to “teach them a lesson” and prevent future pregnancies.

Stories of judgement, of being made to feel unfit, of terrible treatment – these are the stories that young parents bring to the table.

Isn’t that a spectacularly crappy way to start your parenting journey?

Frankly, it saddens me. Teenage parents are not any less capable than older parents. Parenting is a great levelling field, where ostensibly, everyone starts off on an equal footing. Young parents do not love their children any less fiercely, nor is their age a barrier to being a good parent.

Anyone can be a great parent. Age does not change that.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }