The sexualisation of women and what is art, really?

by Veronica on February 3, 2011

in Soapbox

For thousands of years, we had worshipped women. Our ability to create and sustain life were something to be lauded. We were powerful and some religions held women in great regard. The lines of inheritance passed through women, because let’s face it, you can never doubt who mothered a child.

And then life changed. Other religions came into play, as powerful countries came into power and forced the pagans out. Women became chattels, owned possessions. No voice, no power. Our place in life changed and our belief in ourselves also.

In the early 1900’s the suffragette movement stole back our voice, but women had taken a back seat for so many hundreds of years that our power had been diluted. Our ability to give life became something slightly shameful, even if the end result was something we could be proud of.

Our bodies were no longer solely our own. Men held claim to it and we were objects to be owned. It feels that, as a culture, we have not gotten over this mentality yet, despite the feminist movement. Our bodies are still seen by some as shameful and no conversation is held with our daughters about the beauty of curves. Women have their genitalia cut off, the unclean parts removed, leaving behind a hole for a man’s use only. We rail against the unjustness of this and yet, plastic surgeons in our own countries practise removal of labia minora for cosmetic reasons. Does the addition of anaesthetic and a medical degree change what is being done?

Our power, that had once been held in such high regard was tattered and torn. Some we scraped back together, but most disappeared in the face of change. Accompanying that came the sexualisation of women. Breasts that were designed to nurture our babies became the symbols of lust and were flashed across billboards throughout the world. Yet women are still victimised for breastfeeding a baby in a public area. ‘I don’t want to see that’ is spat, in disgust, while a bikini clad model flashes across the screen above their heads.

The dirtiness associated with vaginas hasn’t faded. Tucked away under panties most of the time, when seen in media it is nothing more than a tiny pink slit, hairless like a child – the power of a woman airbrushed out of it.

And so I celebrate pieces of artwork that desexualise vulvas. Artwork that show beauty and individuality, even as others claim that vulvas are not meant to be seen or looked at.

I’ve spoken to people who left MONA a little shell shocked, certain that some works in there can’t possibly be considered art. The canvas depicting a man being fucked by a dog caused a bit of consternation, surely that wasn’t art? Yet, in the same gallery sits Leda and the Swan, a globally acclaimed bronze that depicts Leda being fucked by a swan. The conversation turned to the fact that women are the ones who are meant to be fucked, not men. That is the reason the canvas is considered distasteful, and the bronze is not.

By the nature of a womans vulva, intercourse became something that was done to us, not something we did. Men are the fuckers and women are the fuckees. In reality, it doesn’t always work like that and personal circumstances and sexuality will change with every relationship, but the cultural shift was there and unchangeable.

This of course proves my point about sexualisation.

Art doesn’t have to be beautiful. Art can be a statement about the world around us, or culture. It can be ugly. It can be a machine that turns food into fecal matter, a dig at the art world itself, a claim that all artwork, is, in the very end, crap.

Art is meant to make us think and in this day and age of overexposure to media and pornography, sometimes that art needs to be shocking to make its point. I don’t think this is a bad thing, merely the equivalent to shaking someone by the shoulders to get them to listen properly.

MONA doesn’t shrink away from the artwork that other galleries refuse to hang and in the end, if all it does is make us question our perception of our culture, then that can only be a good thing.

I for one, like questioning why we think the way we do and why we, the collective we, are so ready to accept some things as beautiful and declare others to be shameful.

Look at what vaginas can do afterall.

lceel February 3, 2011 at 10:34 pm

Personally, I adore women. Personally, I am angered by the notion of mutilating women for religious or aesthetic purposes. For ANY reason, for that matter.

I am just a man. One man. And one man’s opinion cannot and will not change the world.

Would that it could.

Veronica February 3, 2011 at 10:38 pm

Would that it could indeed. I’m not even sure that the fault lies with individuals themselves, because most individuals at the core are amazing, accepting people. It’s the entire culture that is ingrained in our skin and breathed in that is the problem.

And yes I know, huge generalisations in this post. It seemed to warrant them.

frogpondsrock February 4, 2011 at 7:13 am

I disagree Lou that one Man’s opinion can not change the world. I think it can. Albeit slowly. Look at your circle of influence. You have three sons. Your opinion counts highly with those three men. So you have a lot of influence within your circle. Don’t discount your own power Lou 🙂 remember the ripple effect.

Marylin February 3, 2011 at 11:06 pm

I think if I ever manage to visit you, I’m going to have to see MONA.

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 10:10 am

Yes, you have to. Win lottery dammit!

Potpourri Gal February 4, 2011 at 12:07 am

Coming from a society that worships women as a symbol of strength and motherhood but at the sametime still practices barbaric rituals such as female infanticide, dowry harrasment and honour killings I feel like you have spilled out the unspoken thoughts in my head in this post as if you could read them from so many miles away! In fact I can see the differences you speak about in more places than just art here, I see them in my everyday life. I am proud of where I come from, but I really wish our “culture” was defined by the art, literature and music and just the pure celebration of life other than anything else. We need to go back to the world that was created for us by a more superior power than just follow the rules or paths set up by mere individuals. A world where there was just men, women and nature no boundaries, no passports or anything else.

I know I have taken this way off the topic but I couldnt stop myself! And a great post V! I think every single drop in the ocean contributes to it mighty strength, so glad to read your thoughts here.

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 10:12 am

What culture are you from?

And I like when I can write a post that articulates what others are thinking too, it proves that I’m not so strange afterall!

Happy Elf Mom February 4, 2011 at 12:23 am

I myself don’t understand why anyone thinks it’s OK to show naked statues and whatnot, no matter which era we’re talking about. I’d be the person tacking he little fig leaves everywhere. I don’t think sexuality or genitalia is something that should be put on public display.

Though you are right… we need to be cultural bigots and not allow these operations to go on on young girls if we can help it. There should be criminal charges pending against any physician who does this procedure. Did you know it can make urinating very difficult and would also make for a horridly painful wedding night…

adele February 4, 2011 at 10:01 am

I am curious to know what it is that you find offensive about the human form? Is the view formed as a result of a religious belief or is there something else underlying it?

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 10:13 am

And you know I disagree with you, hehe. I think shame in the human body fosters all sorts of other problems and that desexualising the human body is a good way to go about lessening shame. Really, we’re all very alike anyway.

rachael February 4, 2011 at 4:27 am

I feel like I am too old to be looking at vulvas and thinking, ‘Wow, who knew.’ What I see here is an act of demystifying the body. Why shouldn’t young men know how various are the bodies of women? Why shouldn’t young women know how various the bodies of men? Why shouldn’t they all see their differences as beautiful? Why should we feel the need to move our gaze, why should we feel shame? Shame in any culture is frightening weapon. It is more frightening when it is made normal by surgeons and young men who could not possibly understand how deeply their prejudices lay, and how incapable they are of changing them.

I applaud you Veronica.

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 10:16 am

I agree too. Maybe that’s why I adored the Balletlab performances so much too, the nudity was matter of fact and the dancing was so powerful that the nudity was just a tool to heighten what what happening.

adele February 4, 2011 at 10:05 am

I have always been a big believer in the beauty of the human body, and in particular the curves of the female body. I find it a little obscene that many people are totally fine with watching (and allowing their children to watch) violence, yet as soon as a loving sex scene or a nude form is presented it is not suitable. No wonder many people grow up with fucked up views of their bodies!

Veronica, I am extremely keen to come down and have a look through MONA. I think a Tassie trip will be in order this year.

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 10:20 am

I find the same thing strange too, violence is okay, but nudity is not? Okay, right. To be fair, I wouldn’t let my children watch a sex scene, but I don’t feel nudity is going to scar them.

adele February 4, 2011 at 10:24 am

Oh, I agree entirely – depending on the age of the child, sex scenes are probably a no go. I guess the point I am trying to make is that children shouldn’t be taught that sex and their sexuality is a bad, evil thing. That is where problems are made.

Tanya February 4, 2011 at 12:32 pm

My mum was a big advocate for being open with us as children so I pretty much saw anything and everything from an early age and was told to embrace and accept my body for what it is. Even so it didn’t matter during my teenage years and I’m still not happy with who I am on the outside at 23.

I really like this post V, well done 🙂

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 12:58 pm

I think that is because self esteem is an entirely different thing again. Not being shocked by nudity in others, or in art, is completely different from being comfortable getting nude yourself.

Peggy Brister February 4, 2011 at 3:53 pm

Did you/would you let your young kids see the wall of women’s lady parts?

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 4:01 pm

Did I? No, my kids haven’t been yet. With their issues, having them out in public is tricky enough without adding in breakable/untouchable things.

Will I let them see? Definitely, when I think they’re old enough and if they’re still there. So letting my young kids see, maybe not. But if it were a wall of nude paintings, rather than the intricacies of a vagina, I wouldn’t have a problem with it. They see us naked often enough.

The wall in MONA does come with a parental guidance warning so that parents know to avoid it if they’re uncomfortable letting kids see.

Naomi February 5, 2011 at 11:23 am

I have talked to my children about this art work, and will happily take them to see it. One girl, one boy. I want them to be happy in their own skin, I want them to know we are all different, and that our bodies are not something to be ashamed of. I’d much rather them see this exhibit than let them watch most music video clips on rage.

Steve February 4, 2011 at 5:36 pm

I see art all around and have always been suspicious of people who claim to be its only credentialled authorities. Whilst I respect art history I don’t think you need to master it to enjoy or understand art. Many artists themselves are unable to articulate what it is they have created which makes it the more suspect when the so called arbiters decipher its meaning. What makes Walsh’s collection so great in my opinion is that he tips no hats nor defers to anyone and so he is uncumbered by the usual cheap shots about ‘public funding’ and that old chestnut ‘I don’t want my taxes paying for that’ etc etc.
My interpretation is that art holds a mirror up to us and at times this makes us uncomfortable, angry, happy, desirous and a whole buch of other emotions, even indifference. These emotions remind us that we are alive and living in the moment, bristling with all our frailties.
I’ll be taking my kids to the gallery and I’m sure they’ll have their own views on what they see.
As to the sexualization of woman, well thats a huge topic but i will leave with this: men and woman are both responsible for the way society views these things. Yes you could say its conditioning that disempowers woman but as one of your earlier commenters said, one person can make a difference, the ripple effect and so on.

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 7:07 pm

I agree with you completely, including about why Walsh’s collection is so fantastic. I love that he can display whatever he likes, with no ‘tax payer dollar, tax payer complaints’ being thrown around. Of course, we’ve heard the ‘proceeds of gambling’ horse trotted out quite regularly, but I frankly don’t care where the money came from.

Sexualisation, yes, both sexes to blame for that and no one thing we can blame. The ripple effect is something for me to think on, that and our ‘sphere of influence’ (as stolen from Bob Buchanan).

river February 4, 2011 at 6:51 pm

*clap* clap* clap*
Great post.
But, nude ballet??
I’m not sure I’d agree with that. All that leaping and twirling? With unsupported breasts? Think of the strain on neck and shoulder muscles.

Veronica February 4, 2011 at 7:04 pm

Ah, it wasn’t traditional ballet. More running and movement. Plus they were rather small breasted women, hehe.

Barbara February 5, 2011 at 12:42 am

Interesting post. Thank you.

Veronica February 5, 2011 at 8:13 pm

You’re welcome 🙂

Beet February 5, 2011 at 1:35 am

frank, honest and open discussion is a great starting point for making any change. Great work Veronica is starting the discussion. 🙂

Veronica February 5, 2011 at 8:13 pm

Frank discussion is something I am a big fan of. But then, you know that!

Wanderlust February 5, 2011 at 9:40 am

I love your thoughts on the human body and power and (de)sexualisation. Agree, agree. I’m not a big fan of highly sexualized art or art that I consider vulgar, but that’s just me. I hated the whole “piss Jesus” thing for instance. I suppose it works for some people, I just thought it sensationalistic. I understand that it’s making a statement about the artist’s outlook or our culture, but it’s just not a statement that I wish to absorb while walking through a gallery.

Veronica February 5, 2011 at 8:14 pm

I’d never heard of the piss Jesus thing, what was it?

edenland February 5, 2011 at 7:52 pm

Oh my God Veronica …. I started reading your post and thought, well soon she will attribute a quote to it. It was so brilliantly articulated and voiced … I thought it was from some famous scholar or something.

That is an UNBELIEVABLE piece of writing. Wow. And I agree with every single thing you said … and the post before this, the pics … THANK YOU. You have no idea how relieving it was for me – sad, isn’t it. I’m 38, still grappling with accepting my vagina, fucks sake.

I can’t wait to meet you.

Veronica February 5, 2011 at 8:15 pm

Nope my lovely, all me and all mine. It’s been rattling around in my head for quite a while.

I’m glad you liked it, and the vaginas. You should come to Tassie, just to see Mona. I think you’d love it.

Caveat Calcei February 5, 2011 at 8:22 pm

Hi Veronica

A fellow Aussie Blogger conference attendee popped along to my blog this week to say hi in advice.

This seemed like a brilliant idea and I decided to follow her lead.

The more people who see what bodies look like in a non-sexual context, the more people there will be who have better body images.

It horrifies me that women would voluntarily submit to labioplasty and similar cosmetic procedures on their genitalia. In the same way that our faces are all meant to be different, so are our vulvas.

Bec @ Bad Mummy February 7, 2011 at 1:42 pm

I’ve had these thoughts too though I’ve never been able to express them so eloquently. You’ve written a fantastic post here lady, well done.

(Also I had no idea about labiaplasty! I mean OH MY GOD!)

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: